Archive for March, 2009

Even that Douche Hannity is pulling his head out of his ass a little!

I wasn’t screaming about this for nothing.

In the video here, the former Clintonite Dick Morris, who is now a darling of Fox News, tells Sean Hannity the globalists will put the “American economy under international regulation” and “those people who have been yelling, oh, the UN is going to take over… they’ve been crazy, but now they’re right.”

“Those conspiracy people,” Sean Hannity interjects, “had suggested that for years… you’re not wrong.”

It’s the “international regulation of the financial institutions” we have to worry about, warns Dick Morris. It will happen under “IMF control… Remember, the IMF is run by the Europeans and backed by Americans.”

It’s too bad Mr. Morris didn’t give us the rest of the story. The IMF is a loan sharking operation created by the bankers under the Bretton Woods scheme and its primary purpose to date has been to get third world nations into hock so they can be more effectively looted. It is now poised, as Morris eludes, to embark on a far more ambitious bankster scam — to initiate something called “global quantitative easing” by printing billions of dollars worth of a global “super-currency,” deceptively billed as a way to address the economic crisis manufactured by the global elite.

“Alistair Darling and senior figures in the US Treasury have been encouraging the Fund to issue hundreds of billions of dollars worth of so-called Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) in the coming months as part of its campaign to prevent the recession from turning into a global depression,” the Telegraph reported on March 16.

SDRs are now based on four currencies — the US dollar, the Japanese yen, the euro and the British pound. They are used largely as a unit of account by the IMF and other international organizations.

Read between the lines and you get to the bottom of the real reason for the issuance of SDRs — to push for a world currency. Recall a few days ago Zhou Xiaochuan, China’s central bank’s governor, calling for the IMF to forge a new world reserve currency.

China demands a settlement system between the SDRs and other currencies so that they can be used in international trade and financial transactions. The IMF would manage these SDRs and they would gradually replace existing reserve currencies.

As envisioned by our rulers, a world “super-currency” will ultimately require a world government. Morris blames the Europeans for this and he is only partially right — it is a scam long ago devised by international bankers primarily based in Europe and Britain and backed, as Morris admits, by the American financial elite.

The issuance of paper SDRs “would please the plutocratic international bankers” to no end, writes Robert Bradshaw, and this “move would allow them a golden opportunity to print fiat paper money in huge quantities to flood the world. We can be sure that the fat cats [the bankers] would love to have a new paper world currency in their greedy little hands. Since they already control the IMF and most world central banks, such a new global currency would definitely fit into their plans for world rule.”

It is hardly surprising that SDRs and world currency will be on the agenda at the G20 this week. The globalist George Soros has urged Obama to push the SDR agenda and has warned that if a world currency is not established and the global economy collapses (as planned) the United States “shall cease to be the dominant financial power” and “China is liable to come up ahead.” Soros is merely running a time-tested shell game in an effort to get the U.S. to pony up for what will ultimately be its demise, again as planned. China is the model to be used for our totalitarian future.

Dick Morris and the disinfo operative Sean Hannity may indeed be alarmed by this obvious push for world government. It is interesting to note that Hannity has only lately come around to the existence of the New World Order — formerly in the realm of crazy conspiracy theories — now that Obama is in the White House and the Democrats in control of Congress. Hannity and Morris are simply reading from a provided script.

Point is, the New World Order wants you to know what they have in mind for you. It tickles them to give you a preview of things to come now that the New Savior is in office and enjoying high popularity — a one world government with a high-tech control grid overlay designed to usher in a brave new world of hellish serfdom and eventually the dream of our eugenicist rulers: a mass culling of the herd who are considered little more than useless eaters.

Add comment March 31, 2009

Gerald Celente on the Alex Jones Show 27 Jan 09

Add comment March 31, 2009

Audacity Of Dope!

Add comment March 30, 2009

Controlling the Farms

Add comment March 30, 2009

Ron Paul gets frustrated w/the media

Add comment March 30, 2009

Drew Carey Responds To Obama’s Anti-Medical Marijuana Speech 3/27/2009

Add comment March 30, 2009

Call Your Congressman/women Today! Tell them to support HR 1207

Add comment March 27, 2009

Mexico is getting worse. Yet, we send more troops to the Middle East?

m09_18129685

m04_18398781

m10_181094071

MORE PICS HERE:
http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2009/03/mexicos_drug_war.html

A word from __________

How Free Are?

Right now (3/25/2009) I am watching this report about the kids being assassins for the cartels and cannot help but notice the date on the tape is from 7-28-2006; which of course means that this is old news which is true. Another point that I would like to state is that they talk about Garcia being killed with his wife pregnant wife in the car. Not only do they fail to state that this happened in 2005 they also fail to state that Garcia was a high ranking member in the Mexican Mafia and was involved in the drug trade (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xu3Z8QqUgtE&feature=related) (start watching at 6:45).The truth is that this has been going on for a long time! So what is the advantage of bringing it up now and making a big deal about something that has been going on for years? As did many other people in school I read the book 1984 by George Orwell and realized, like everyone else did, that I would not want to live in that kind of world; but when I look at where we are today it brings up some unsettling similarities. I see people setting up cameras in their homes in the form of computers and phones that allow you to see the person you’re talking to. Do you really think that the government could not access those cameras and see into your homes? There is GPS being put into cars and cell phones which makes it easy to follow your every movement should the government choose to. Even while driving around in my car I see random video cameras set up around the city and also there are now cameras set up on the side of the highway that takes your picture and sends you a ticket if you are speeding. On the news they are saying Mexico may become a failed state but do not go into detail of what that means. It is a term is very broad and does not include details. The term “terrorists” is also being used to strike fear into people. Now I may wrong but I do see something that can very possibly occur in the near future and that is using the Mexican drug war to strike fear in American citizens in order to slowly strip away our rights to privacy and our freedom. I hear of making national ID cards and RFID chips will hold all of your personal information including finger prints and DNA data. I see us heading in the direction of 1984 and I think we need to stand up and look at what is really going on here. We need to stand united and not allow this to happen. It is your everyday, average people who are the foundation of this nation and without a stable foundation everything will fall. This is just my opinion on our current situation and I am practicing my right to freedom of speech. If you agree I encourage you to repost this in as many blogs and places possible and talk to family and friends about it. I am not saying I am right or wrong but just take my opinion into consideration with an open mind.

Add comment March 27, 2009

Global currency story gains steam

Well, here’s a story the White House probably isn’t too thrilled about. Speaking at the Council on Foreign Relations today, Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner stated that he was “open” to a proposal by the governor of China’s central bank to replace the dollar with a new global currency:

“We’re actually quite open to that suggestion – you should see it as rather evolutionary rather building on the current architecture rather than moving us to global monetary union,” he said.

“The only thing concrete I saw was expanding the use of the [special drawing rights],” Geithner said. “Anything he’s thinking about deserves some consideration.”

Meanwhile, White House economic adviser economic adviser Austan Goolsbee tried to downplay the issue when pressed by Wolf Blitzer on CNN:

“Different people have in the past argued for world currencies or new — new currencies before. I believe the U.S. at this point is the safest place to invest in the world. And it’s likely to remain that the dollar is a critical currency in the years ahead.”

President Obama dismissed the issue at his press conference last night.

2 comments March 27, 2009

David Icke, 2 + 2 =5

Add comment March 27, 2009

Watch fatboy get nervous and try to avoid the question.

Add comment March 27, 2009

Someone needs to talk to BO like this (again)

Add comment March 26, 2009

Jim Rogers on China Mar 24 2009

Add comment March 26, 2009

Gerald Celente Predicts Economic Armageddon by 2012

Add comment March 26, 2009

PETER SCHIFF – The Crisis Just Begun

Add comment March 26, 2009

Gerald Celente The Greatest Depression is still to Come

“It’s not even economics 101, it’s economics for dummies.”

Add comment March 26, 2009

Ten Trillion and Counting by PBS’s Frontline

p_title

The journey begins as FRONTLINE correspondent Forrest Sawyer takes viewers to a secret location: the Treasury’s debt auction room, where the U.S. government sells securities backed by the “full faith and credit of the United States.” On this day, the government is auctioning $67 billion of Treasury securities. The money borrowed will be used to fund services and programs that the government cannot pay for through tax revenues alone.

Observers warn that the United States’ reliance on borrowing to fund essential programs is a dangerous gamble. For the first time, investors are beginning to question the ability of federal government to meet its growing financial obligations, and fading confidence can have dire consequences. “You might have a situation where there is one day when the government says we need to sell several billion dollars of bonds, and nobody shows,” Economist reporter Greg Ip tells FRONTLINE. “No money to pay the Social Security checks, no money to give to the states for their Medicaid programs. Cut, cut, cut, cut, cut.”

Yet more borrowing is exactly what the Obama administration plans to do: hundreds of billions to bail out the banks and other financial institutions; tens of billions more for the auto industry; $275 billion for homeowners and mortgage lenders; and a giant $787 billion stimulus package to jump-start an economy spiraling downward. Just like the Bush administration before it, Obama and his team are going to borrow big.

“That’s the paradox of the situation that we’re in now,” observes Matt Miller, author of The Tyranny of Dead Ideas. “Government has got to run big deficits to stimulate the economy, deficits that would have been unthinkable … because government’s the only entity with the wherewithal to prop up a demand in the economy when businesses and consumers are all pulling back.”

Thanks for finding this Dennis of: http://www.lightsoutinteractive.com/

Add comment March 26, 2009

And, this only shows until 2010

garrison-bho-deficits

Add comment March 26, 2009

Peter Schiff Explains the Economy

CNBC really should devote an hour to airing this speech in its entirety. In it Schiff explains, in a jargon-free manor, what went wrong with the economy, why the central planners are mostly to blame, and what is likely to come next.

Add comment March 26, 2009

Hypotized!

Add comment March 26, 2009

Obama Working on a new Law to Allow Searching of PC’s, Laptops, & Media Devices

Add comment March 26, 2009

Timmy! She’s concerned.

Here we have Marcy Kaptur and as you can see she is a democrat. However, she has no problem speaking out against he democratic leader’s bullshit plan.

Add comment March 26, 2009

Someone needs to talk to BO like this

This is great!

1 comment March 26, 2009

This is all you need to know about Peter Schiff and the current state of the Economy

This is a great video and conversation.

Add comment March 26, 2009

More on Robert Baer

Add comment March 25, 2009

What did the 20-year CIA employee, Robert Baer just say?

In an interview with Thom Hartmann on June 9, 2006, Baer was asked if he believed “that there was an aspect of ‘inside job’ to 9/11 within the U.S. government”. He replied, “There is that possibility, the evidence points at it.”  However, he later stated, “For the record, I don’t believe that the World Trade Center was brought down by our own explosives, or that a rocket, rather than an airliner, hit the Pentagon. I spent a career in the CIA trying to orchestrate plots, wasn’t all that good at it, and certainly couldn’t carry off 9/11. Nor could the real pros I had the pleasure to work with.

Add comment March 25, 2009

Pop Music for Ron Paul?

It’s actually tolerable.

1 comment March 25, 2009

Ron has the answer

Add comment March 25, 2009

Ron Paul getting pissed at Benny

At the end, you can tell Ron Paul is pissed and that it’s all a big joke to them.

Quote: The reason why fed was created in 1913 because in 1907 and 1914 there were big financial panics blah blah so the 1914 panic was one of the main reasons why the fed was born in 1913? did i get it right?

Ben, the 4th most powerful person in the world in an annual ranking by Newsweek http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ben_Bernanke gets bet down by Ron in all confrontations.

Add comment March 25, 2009

AIG hearing of 24 March, 2009 – Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA) questions Geithner

Geithner is a piece of shit. Same shit as Paulson.

Add comment March 24, 2009

O B A M A

o_b_a_m_a

Add comment March 24, 2009

Really? Give the Fed more power? Really?

Geithner seeks new powers over financial companies

By JEANNINE AVERSA, AP Economics Writer Jeannine Aversa, Ap Economics Writer 6 mins ago

WASHINGTON – Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner asked Congress on Tuesday for broad new powers to regulate nonbank financial companies like troubled insurer American International Group whose collapse could jeopardize the economy. BECAUSE THEY HAVE DONE SUCH A GOOD JOB!

“AIG highlights broad failures of our financial system,” Geithner told the House Financial Services Committee. “We must ensure that our country never faces this situation again.”

At the same time, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke revealed that he had considered filing suit to keep AIG from paying millions in executive bonuses but that his legal advisers counseled him against it.

Geithner acknowledged that the current climate of anger, including the furor over those retention bonuses, will complicate any effort by the Obama administration to get more bailout money from Congress. “We recognize it will be extraordinarily difficult,” he said.

The administration sought to use that rancor to build support for its financial overhaul proposals.

Geithner joined Bernanke in calling for greater governmental authority over complicated and troubled financial companies — power they likened to the authority wielded over banks by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. That includes the power to seize control of institutions, take over their bad loans and other illiquid assets and sell good ones to competitors.

AIG is a globally interconnected colossus, with 74 million customers worldwide and operations in more than 130 countries. The government decided it was simply too big to let fail.

“Its failure could have resulted in a 1930s-style global financial and economic meltdown, with catastrophic implications for production, income and jobs,” Bernanke told the panel.

Geithner, Bernanke and New York Fed President William C. Dudley testified in a rare joint appearance before the panel. Their testimony came a day after the Fed unveiled a new bank rescue plan under which the government would take responsibility for up to $1 trillion in sour mortgage securities with the help of private investors.

That delighted Wall Street and the Dow industrials shot up nearly 500 points. On Tuesday, Wall Street gave back some of its gains and the Dow was down just over 45 points in midday trading.

Much of Tuesday’s discussion centered on ways to help the government better deal with future AIG-like companies whose failure could devastate the financial system and the drag down the economy.

“As we have seen with AIG, distress at large, interconnected, non-depository financial institutions can pose systemic risks just as distress at banks can,” Geithner said. “The administration proposes legislation to give the U.S. government the same basic set of tools for addressing financial distress at non-banks as it has in the bank context”

Geithner made it clear he believes the treasury secretary should be granted unprecedented power, after consultation with Federal Reserve Board officials, to take control of a major financial institution and run it. The treasury chief is an official of the administration, unlike the FDIC, which is an independent regulatory agency.

The witnesses were asked if AIG would have been treated any differently, including the payment of $165 million in bonuses earlier this month, if such powers had existed last September, when the Fed began the government bailout of the insurer.

“Quite differently. It could have been taken into receivership or conservatorship. …The bonus issue would not have arisen,” Bernanke said.

He said that contracts providing for the bonuses could have been adjusted and “we could have taken haircuts” against some of AIG’s financial obligations to other companies.

AIG has become a symbol of reckless risk-taking on Wall Street. The bonuses came even as AIG reported a stunning $62 billion loss, the biggest in U.S. corporate history.

The government has bailed out AIG four times, to the tune of more than $180 billion altogether.

New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo said Monday that 15 employees who received some of the largest bonuses from AIG have agreed to return them in full, totaling about $50 million.

The House last week voted overwhelmingly to slap 90 percent taxes on the largest bonuses. Similar but more limited legislation is before the Senate.

Still, White House support for using the tax code in such a fashion has been tepid at best. And Democrats seem to be moving off the concept.

“If the money is returned, the legislation may no longer be necessary,” said House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md.

As to Geithner seeking more authority, Hoyer said he wanted to discuss with committee Chairman Barney Frank, D-Mass., “whether or not such delegation is appropriate or whether there should be greater oversight.”

Geithner has been sharply criticized for his role in the AIG bailout because he helped put the deal together last September as then-president of the New York Fed, yet said he did not learn of the big bonuses until two weeks ago.

In a sharp exchange, Geithner was asked by Rep. Brad Sherman, D-Calif., whether there were other financial companies besides AIG who took taxpayer bailouts and then paid big bonuses to their executives.

“You’re right, this goes well beyond AIG,” said Geithner.

Sherman asked for a public list of those companies and an accounting of the bonuses they paid.

Geither was noncommital. Sherman told him he was trying to “hide the ball.”

“I’m not going to hide the ball,” Geithner said. “I’ll reflect on the suggestion you made.”

Bernanke said it was “highly inappropriate to pay substantial bonuses” to the employees. Bernanke said he asked that the payments be stopped but was told that they were mandated by contracts agreed to before the government seized control of AIG on September 16.

“I then asked that suit be filed to prevent the payments,” he said. Bernanke said that his legal staff counseled against this action on the grounds that Connecticut law provided for substantial punitive damages in the event any such suit failed. AIG’s financial products division has a base in Connecticut.

The AIG bonuses created a public relations headache for President Barack Obama at a time when he was trying to gin up public and political support for his economic policies, bank-rescue plan and overhaul of the nation’s regulatory structure.

Government bailouts of AIG, Citigroup Inc., Bank of America Corp. and others have put billions of taxpayers’ dollars at risk over the past year and have angered the American public.

___

Associated Press writer Martin Crutsinger contributed to this report.

1 comment March 24, 2009

Gerald Celente with Jim Puplava

Add comment March 24, 2009

What do you think about Obama taxing 90% of the AIG bonuses?

I had several people ask me, “What do you think about Obama taxing 90% of the AIG bonuses? Pretty cool right?”

My thoughts are, Nah, it’s not cool. You’re actually a little late there BO, you shouldn’t have bailed them out in the first place! If you ask me AIG is being parading in the media to misdirect our anger about the bailouts, excessive spending and so-called stimulous packages.

Wake up folks! Barack is screwing you just as much as Bush did. We are being robbed daily in broad ass daylight!

Time for some Q and A:

1. Now, was it Obama who put the tax on or Congress?

2. Does he all the sudden have congress’s power of the purse?

3. Or is he just running rampant like Bush w/exec orders? People need to think about those things, not analyze that which is there to distract them.

1 comment March 24, 2009

Yes We Can!

Add comment March 24, 2009

Makes sense to me!

Add comment March 24, 2009

Bonus Outrage is Politically Driven

Channel: C-SPAN
Date: 3/19/2009

Ron Paul: Today there is a lot of expression of outrage, and indeed there should be. I don’t believe that this resolution really addresses the real problem that we have. It looks like it is giving the administration an excuse by saying that he is only doing what we have asked him to do. And in many ways, this is true.

And the real fault, I think, falls with the Congress ever giving this money and allowing this to happen. But to excuse the administration and then complain about these bonuses and think that that can solve our problems… it just won’t do that.

The real outrage, I think, is the lack of monitoring of what we do. We give out money, we have no strings attached, we give out hundreds of billions of dollars, and we totally ignore what the Federal Reserve does, by it issuing literally trillions of dollars, and yet this is the emergency legislation.

This is politically driven, I happen to believe, and I think people would like to express their outrage, and they do. It’s an easy target picking on AIG, but we create these problems. We create them by doing things that are unconstitutional. We come up with these schemes and these expressions and excuses.

At the same time we don’t address the subject of why do we spend money, why do we allow a monetary system to operate without any supervision by the Congress. That’s what our real problem is, and someday we will address that and deal with this rather than doing it in a political way and saying, “Well, it’s not our fault, it’s their fault”.

In his appearance on Wednesday’s Freedom Watch Ron Paul talked more about his position on the hot topic of bonuses. He clarified that while Congress should act to get the bonus money back because it was stolen from taxpayers, it’s the entire bailout should have never happened.


Add comment March 22, 2009

I thought I was intense

But you know what? This guy is dead on, people should be this angry.

It’s not AIG. It’s the GOV…

Britney Spears is Going on Tour…

the Government Housing Scam…

Obama Bumper Stickers…

Pelosi is a LIAR and a THIEF…

Barack Obama Elementary School…

Add comment March 22, 2009

Gerald Celente with Jason Burmas 03-13-09

Add comment March 21, 2009

Speak up Rolling Stone!

26763744-26763749-slarge

It’s over — we’re officially, royally fucked. no empire can survive being rendered a permanent laughingstock, which is what happened as of a few weeks ago, when the buffoons who have been running things in this country finally went one step too far. It happened when Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner was forced to admit that he was once again going to have to stuff billions of taxpayer dollars into a dying insurance giant called AIG, itself a profound symbol of our national decline — a corporation that got rich insuring the concrete and steel of American industry in the country’s heyday, only to destroy itself chasing phantom fortunes at the Wall Street card tables, like a dissolute nobleman gambling away the family estate in the waning days of the British Empire.

The latest bailout came as AIG admitted to having just posted the largest quarterly loss in American corporate history — some $61.7 billion. In the final three months of last year, the company lost more than $27 million every hour. That’s $465,000 a minute, a yearly income for a median American household every six seconds, roughly $7,750 a second. And all this happened at the end of eight straight years that America devoted to frantically chasing the shadow of a terrorist threat to no avail, eight years spent stopping every citizen at every airport to search every purse, bag, crotch and briefcase for juice boxes and explosive tubes of toothpaste. Yet in the end, our government had no mechanism for searching the balance sheets of companies that held life-or-death power over our society and was unable to spot holes in the national economy the size of Libya (whose entire GDP last year was smaller than AIG’s 2008 losses).

So it’s time to admit it: We’re fools, protagonists in a kind of gruesome comedy about the marriage of greed and stupidity. And the worst part about it is that we’re still in denial — we still think this is some kind of unfortunate accident, not something that was created by the group of psychopaths on Wall Street whom we allowed to gang-rape the American Dream. When Geithner announced the new $30 billion bailout, the party line was that poor AIG was just a victim of a lot of shitty luck — bad year for business, you know, what with the financial crisis and all. Edward Liddy, the company’s CEO, actually compared it to catching a cold: “The marketplace is a pretty crummy place to be right now,” he said. “When the world catches pneumonia, we get it too.” In a pathetic attempt at name-dropping, he even whined that AIG was being “consumed by the same issues that are driving house prices down and 401K statements down and Warren Buffet’s investment portfolio down.”

Liddy made AIG sound like an orphan begging in a soup line, hungry and sick from being left out in someone else’s financial weather. He conveniently forgot to mention that AIG had spent more than a decade systematically scheming to evade U.S. and international regulators, or that one of the causes of its “pneumonia” was making colossal, world-sinking $500 billion bets with money it didn’t have, in a toxic and completely unregulated derivatives market.

Nor did anyone mention that when AIG finally got up from its seat at the Wall Street casino, broke and busted in the afterdawn light, it owed money all over town — and that a huge chunk of your taxpayer dollars in this particular bailout scam will be going to pay off the other high rollers at its table. Or that this was a casino unique among all casinos, one where middle-class taxpayers cover the bets of billionaires.

People are pissed off about this financial crisis, and about this bailout, but they’re not pissed off enough. The reality is that the worldwide economic meltdown and the bailout that followed were together a kind of revolution, a coup d’état. They cemented and formalized a political trend that has been snowballing for decades: the gradual takeover of the government by a small class of connected insiders, who used money to control elections, buy influence and systematically weaken financial regulations.

The crisis was the coup de grâce: Given virtually free rein over the economy, these same insiders first wrecked the financial world, then cunningly granted themselves nearly unlimited emergency powers to clean up their own mess. And so the gambling-addict leaders of companies like AIG end up not penniless and in jail, but with an Alien-style death grip on the Treasury and the Federal Reserve — “our partners in the government,” as Liddy put it with a shockingly casual matter-of-factness after the most recent bailout.

The mistake most people make in looking at the financial crisis is thinking of it in terms of money, a habit that might lead you to look at the unfolding mess as a huge bonus-killing downer for the Wall Street class. But if you look at it in purely Machiavellian terms, what you see is a colossal power grab that threatens to turn the federal government into a kind of giant Enron — a huge, impenetrable black box filled with self-dealing insiders whose scheme is the securing of individual profits at the expense of an ocean of unwitting involuntary shareholders, previously known as taxpayers.

I. PATIENT ZERO

The best way to understand the financial crisis is to understand the meltdown at AIG. AIG is what happens when short, bald managers of otherwise boring financial bureaucracies start seeing Brad Pitt in the mirror. This is a company that built a giant fortune across more than a century by betting on safety-conscious policyholders — people who wear seat belts and build houses on high ground — and then blew it all in a year or two by turning their entire balance sheet over to a guy who acted like making huge bets with other people’s money would make his dick bigger.

That guy — the Patient Zero of the global economic meltdown — was one Joseph Cassano, the head of a tiny, 400-person unit within the company called AIG Financial Products, or AIGFP. Cassano, a pudgy, balding Brooklyn College grad with beady eyes and way too much forehead, cut his teeth in the Eighties working for Mike Milken, the granddaddy of modern Wall Street debt alchemists. Milken, who pioneered the creative use of junk bonds, relied on messianic genius and a whole array of insider schemes to evade detection while wreaking financial disaster. Cassano, by contrast, was just a greedy little turd with a knack for selective accounting who ran his scam right out in the open, thanks to Washington’s deregulation of the Wall Street casino. “It’s all about the regulatory environment,” says a government source involved with the AIG bailout. “These guys look for holes in the system, for ways they can do trades without government interference. Whatever is unregulated, all the action is going to pile into that.”

The mess Cassano created had its roots in an investment boom fueled in part by a relatively new type of financial instrument called a collateralized-debt obligation. A CDO is like a box full of diced-up assets. They can be anything: mortgages, corporate loans, aircraft loans, credit-card loans, even other CDOs. So as X mortgage holder pays his bill, and Y corporate debtor pays his bill, and Z credit-card debtor pays his bill, money flows into the box.

The key idea behind a CDO is that there will always be at least some money in the box, regardless of how dicey the individual assets inside it are. No matter how you look at a single unemployed ex-con trying to pay the note on a six-bedroom house, he looks like a bad investment. But dump his loan in a box with a smorgasbord of auto loans, credit-card debt, corporate bonds and other crap, and you can be reasonably sure that somebody is going to pay up. Say $100 is supposed to come into the box every month. Even in an apocalypse, when $90 in payments might default, you’ll still get $10. What the inventors of the CDO did is divide up the box into groups of investors and put that $10 into its own level, or “tranche.” They then convinced ratings agencies like Moody’s and S&P to give that top tranche the highest AAA rating — meaning it has close to zero credit risk.

Suddenly, thanks to this financial seal of approval, banks had a way to turn their shittiest mortgages and other financial waste into investment-grade paper and sell them to institutional investors like pensions and insurance companies, which were forced by regulators to keep their portfolios as safe as possible. Because CDOs offered higher rates of return than truly safe products like Treasury bills, it was a win-win: Banks made a fortune selling CDOs, and big investors made much more holding them.

The problem was, none of this was based on reality. “The banks knew they were selling crap,” says a London-based trader from one of the bailed-out companies. To get AAA ratings, the CDOs relied not on their actual underlying assets but on crazy mathematical formulas that the banks cooked up to make the investments look safer than they really were. “They had some back room somewhere where a bunch of Indian guys who’d been doing nothing but math for God knows how many years would come up with some kind of model saying that this or that combination of debtors would only default once every 10,000 years,” says one young trader who sold CDOs for a major investment bank. “It was nuts.”

Now that even the crappiest mortgages could be sold to conservative investors, the CDOs spurred a massive explosion of irresponsible and predatory lending. In fact, there was such a crush to underwrite CDOs that it became hard to find enough subprime mortgages — read: enough unemployed meth dealers willing to buy million-dollar homes for no money down — to fill them all. As banks and investors of all kinds took on more and more in CDOs and similar instruments, they needed some way to hedge their massive bets — some kind of insurance policy, in case the housing bubble burst and all that debt went south at the same time. This was particularly true for investment banks, many of which got stuck holding or “warehousing” CDOs when they wrote more than they could sell. And that’s were Joe Cassano came in.

FULL READ HERE:
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/26793903/the_big_takeover/?action=rate#rate

Add comment March 21, 2009

Previous Posts


Categories

 

March 2009
M T W T F S S
« Feb   Apr »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  

Pages

Archives

Blogroll

Meta